SIG Sauer 556 Arms Forum banner
1 - 7 of 7 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
26 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
This is my review of the MFI diopter sight/rail for the Sig 556.

Disclosure: MFI gives a small cash payment for posting a review on a major forum, in this case $25. This did not influence my impression at all, and I intended to post a review before I found this out. I admit to a previous bias towards liking this product, as I was obsessed with my Sig 556 and was on MFI's original mailing list before this product even went into production, way back in 2008.

That being said, why did I wait until 2023 to buy it? I eventually became disillusioned with Sig USA's repeated blunders and poor quality control, and fell out of love with my 556 for a number of years. I have one of the earlier models that came with the fishgill handguards and the terrible flip-up "nail file" rear sight that's begging to get accidentally broken off. Too many questionable design decisions made me become resentful of how much I'd have to continue spending to make it look like a 550-series instead of a bastardized AR that they tried to make in a failed attempt to appeal to the burgeoning AR market. Then Sig USA gave up on their own 556 line altogether, and so did I for awhile.

My rifle has always been very reliable, never misfeeding any ammo I've tried in it. But it sat in the safe for years. I finally took it out to the range a few months ago with the intention of making a final decision: spend some money to make it what I wanted it to be, or just sell it off. I decided it deserved to be what it should have been, and I didn't want to give up a now out-of-production 550-series rifle that takes AR mags AND still has the ability to take any AR stock if I so choose in the future.

I had long ago put classic-style handguards on it. So I bought an AGP 556 folding stock that looks close enough to the 550-series stock, and I ordered the MFI diopter with fiber-optic inserts. The MFI hooded front sight will be ordered as soon as it's back in stock.

This product did not disappoint. At all. It's beautifully crafted. The care and attention to detail that went into its design is obvious. It gave new life to a rifle I was considering getting rid of, and it truly looks like it was supposed to be there all along.

I've corresponded with Michael Frost of MFI a few times over the years. Despite being obviously busy, he's quick to reply and customer service is a top priority.

Installation is a drop-in replacement and takes only a few minutes, a driver, and a few dabs of blue loctite on the threads. It took more time to ensure I didn't lose any pieces from the OEM sight while taking it apart than it did to install the upgrade. The rail itself is obviously better machined than my OEM rail, and the color looks better than the sloppy paint job Sig USA did. The diopter turns easily and the detents click satisfyingly into place. The optional fiber-optic inserts pick up light nicely. You could even drill the holes out and insert tritium if you wanted to go to the trouble.

Cons:
May interfere with some optics (much more so if you get the hooded vs non-hooded front sight)
Price is really the only significant downside here.

That being said, it is not overpriced for what you get. At the time of this writing in 2023, the full set of diopter rail and front hooded sight (both with fiber-optic inserts) is listed at $245. When first offered, it was quite a bit higher than that due to lower-volume production. AR guys are accustomed to seeing a set of good back-up iron sights costing between $100-$200, and those don't include the cost of a rail. The fact that I had to spend that much to make my rifle what Sig USA should have made it in the first place irks me greatly, but I do not regret the purchase.

Pros:
High build quality
Looks amazing
Faithful to the 550-series aesthetic
 

Attachments

· Registered
Joined
·
178 Posts
Damn that's a sweet rifle!. One thing you might want to mention about the MSI diopter is that the elevation direction dots are not present.
A toothpick and some white paint can fix the problem though!

Product Digital camera Reflex camera Camera Camera lens


When your front sight comes in, please let us know how your cheek weld lines up with the MFI sights using the AGP stock!
I just might need to order that folding stock!
 

· Registered
Joined
·
26 Posts
Discussion Starter · #3 · (Edited)
Damn that's a sweet rifle!
Thank you! I once again came to that conclusion once everything was installed, and I'm very happy with my rifle again.

One thing you might want to mention about the MSI diopter is that the elevation direction dots are not present.
Good point, I hadn't noticed that. You've suggested an easy fix that I will probably implement

When your front sight comes in, please let us know how your cheek weld lines up with the MFI sights using the AGP stock!
I just might need to order that folding stock!
Actually, I don't need to wait for the front sight to answer that question. The heights of the sight posts are different enough to affect aim, but not significant enough to affect cheek weld. It does feel like I need to mash my cheek into the AGP stock a little to line up, but it's not uncomfortable, and lineup is quick. It might be uncomfortable on a rifle with more significant recoil, but the 556 recoil impulse is quite gentle.

The top of the AGP stock is straight-line rather than sloped downward as on the Swiss-style stock, which is probably better for optics but not a problem even with these lower irons. A scope would probably require a cheek riser for the Swiss-style stock, but not so with this one. The original fishgill T6 AR-style stock tube is thicker so the alignment with the sights actually seems slightly worse to me.

Despite preferring the 550-style hand-guards, I decided I don't actually HATE the fishgill handguards since they're at least distinctive. However, the fishgill T6 AR-style stock makes me angry to look at and always has. It's a sad imitation, all plastic, looks very shitty, and doesn't feel sturdy at all. By contrast, the AGP stock seems to be some kind of fiber-filled plastic that feels quite sturdy, though I'm not certain about the durability of the plastic latch interface (plastic spring ramp into metal opening, so probably quite adequate).

I didn't weigh them, but the AGP stock feels a little lighter, or at least seems to alter the balance of the rifle when installed. I had seen someone else mention this in a review before buying it. It makes the rifle feel a little front-heavier, which is a plus for recoil control.

I recommend this stock, because it looks a lot more like the Swiss-style than anything else available for this model. I have an unreasonable love for folding stocks, as you can see.
 

Attachments

· Registered
Joined
·
187 Posts
Michael Frost said this on his web site about his MFI Diopter Sight Rail:

"As I am not a huge believer in the accuracy of the .223 / 5.56mm cartridge so I only fully tested the number 1 position at 100m. The #2, 3 and 4 designations may or may not be applicable. I did position the holes in the correct location, but I did not waste time or funds to test something I do not really believe in. While the #2 and #3 holes are the right size and position the #3/4 position hole is much smaller than the original and is NOT threaded for the insert of a target peep sight, nor is it likely to be at the correct angle as I do not have one to check against. The Diopter walls have not been counter bored on the inside either, so the walls are thick in that area to accept a thread. As I said... The hole is much smaller so that the customer could MILL a new hole at whatever angle they need and make it work. Sorry you are on your own on this one... just not cost effective to test / check 100% when 99% of the customers will never have the money to buy a SIG SANs target peep sight much less have the need to use it."

I've never seen anyone post about how well, or not, the diopter holes on his Diopter Sight Rail actually line up with the POI at 200, 300 or 400 meters. Has anybody actually tried it and what were your results?
 

· Registered
Joined
·
26 Posts
Discussion Starter · #7 ·
Update: The front sight came back in stock sooner than expected. Got it installed, which was a bit tedious and probably took a bit longer than it should have because I followed his instructions and was super careful keeping the roll pin lined up), but I had no difficulties and I think it looks great.

The front sight has a fixed blade, and a flip-up arm that puts the fiber-optic right on top of the blade. Light-gathering is pretty good. The hood slightly obstructs view (which is expected and normal for a full hood), but centers up nicely in the diopter.
 

Attachments

1 - 7 of 7 Posts
Top