Does it seem that Sig may have addressed things that were brought to their attention by Ullie? Newer production models don't seem to have as many complaints, unless they're all apathetic bout the issues. Sig legal would certainly advise against acknowledging a problem, simpler to just make updates. What does everyone think?

Recently we saw this kind of corporate mentality with Toyota and the "sticky" gas pedal issue. Any corporate lawyer would advise the company to maintain silence UNLESS the defect is life-threatening. This is what finally got Toyota...

I just bought my Sig in March during the rebate. Many of the items Ullie mentions in his letter are obvious on my rifle after about 300 rounds fired. I still like the gun, but some things should be resolved. The most obvious one is the hammer indentation. On behalf of all of us that visit this forum, Thanks Ullie for what you do!