| Author |
Message |
|
goo
|
Post subject:  Posted: Sat Jun 19, 2010 9:19 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 1:22 pm
Posts: 152
|
tomcat wrote: Mine is JT012xx. I bought in Jan 2010 and shot about 600 rounds. No sign of abnormal wear.
Finally got enough rounds through to check my JT004XX purchased in 2010. 500 rounds and looks perfect, thankfully
Last edited by goo on Mon Jun 21, 2010 1:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
goo
|
Post subject: Posted: Sat Jun 19, 2010 9:24 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 1:22 pm
Posts: 152
|
Lisa wrote:
[color=white]Figure 4: My SIG 556 DMR serial number.In case anyone is still tracking the serial numbers, here's mine.Interesting that we are both JT004xx, but have totally different wear as I have no signs after 500 rounds. I would imagine these guns were assembled from similar parts within weeks of each other. I guess every one is somewhat different.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
thevatmanagain
|
Post subject: Posted: Sun Jun 20, 2010 7:29 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 8:53 pm
Posts: 2
Location: PRK
|
|
Just passed the 10,000 round mark through mine. JS019XXX.
Still the tack driver she was out the box.
_________________
[b]Always fight, never quit[/b]
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
goo
|
Post subject: Posted: Mon Jun 21, 2010 8:39 am |
|
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 1:22 pm
Posts: 152
|
|
When taking apart my gun for the first time, I noticed some grease on the grooves of bolt carrier and inside chamber.
While cleaning the gun this grease was removed. I did use gun oil, but should I put any grease back in any areas?
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
goo
|
Post subject: Posted: Mon Jun 21, 2010 8:42 am |
|
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 1:22 pm
Posts: 152
|
goo wrote: When taking apart my gun for the first time, I noticed some grease on the grooves of bolt carrier and inside chamber.
While cleaning the gun this grease was removed. I did use gun oil, but should I put any grease back in any areas?
http://thefiringline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=53549
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
Antonius
|
Post subject: Top Notch Gunsmith Who Specializes in the SIG 55X Series? Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 7:49 pm |
|
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 10:21 pm
Posts: 10
Location: Dallas, Texas
|
|
Hello Everyone,
I just finished reading this thread and it literally took my breath away. My SIG 556 rifle is out of the serial number range that seems to be having the problems and is still unfired as I bought it as a project gun in lieu of some other firearms projects. It was my intention to make it my "go to" gun for self defense, but now plan to put it in the safe as a shooter for the range ONLY given the abysmal support SIG has provided in responding to this problem. I refuse to rely on a weapon that I cannot count on the manufacturer or a gunsmith to provide reliable support to. My loved ones count on me to protect them, and I take that trust very seriously.
Does anyone know of a top notch gunsmith who specializes in the SIG 55X series of rifles?
If so, please point me in their direction.
Otherwise, this will remain my one and only SIG product to be used ONLY at the range.
- Anthony
_________________
Anthony
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
SkyPup
|
Post subject: Posted: Mon Jul 12, 2010 5:33 am |
|
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 6:07 am
Posts: 1134
Location: Rainbow Bridge, Kazakhstan
|
|
If your 556 is in the safe and never fired, how do you know it is unreliable?
I have two that have fired over 8,000 rounds and both are perfect, as are both of my friends 556s have thousands of rounds through them without a hiccup also.
I would not worry about a problem until after you have a problem....just my $0.02.
_________________
I'd rather Fight than Switch to the "Religion of Peace" - Sic gorgiamus allos subjectatos nunc.
Last edited by SkyPup on Mon Jul 12, 2010 9:52 am, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
Nittany Lion
|
Post subject: Posted: Mon Jul 12, 2010 9:17 am |
|
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:49 am
Posts: 513
Location: in your fridge, making myself at home
|
Antonius wrote: I refuse to rely on a weapon that I cannot count on the manufacturer or a gunsmith to provide reliable support to.
- Anthony Irregardless of by who or when a pistol/rifle/knife was built. If you are worried something breaking during a "time of need", then you should possess the knowledge to correct the issue. If a main spring breaks in a 1911 during your "time of need"; Do you Fed-ex it back to Colt or will you ADAPT? SkyPup wrote: If your 556 is in the safe and never unfired, how do you know it is unreliable?
I would not worry about a problem until after you have a problem....just my $0.02.
+1 gazillion.
all these people are so worried, yet they don't know what is even worrying them!
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
Sarge1998
|
Post subject: Posted: Mon Jul 12, 2010 10:58 am |
|
Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2009 9:41 pm
Posts: 133
Location: St. Charles, IL
|
|
I strongly agree with Skypup and Nittany Lion . Prepare it per Ulie's instructions, then by god use it. Having a malfunction or stoppage is going to happen, understanding how to correct it as well as recognizing what the cause was is vital to improving your skills. Although my 556 is in the range of problem rifles I DO NOT have any problems associated with what's alarming posters.
_________________
P220 P226 BWT P228 P232
556 Classic 522 Classic
And Dick the Dachshund
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
rizcorp
|
Post subject: OK Posted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 5:10 am |
|
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 10:36 pm
Posts: 1
|
|
Just wanted to let the group know that my 556 does not show the same signs of wear and I noticed the hump is non-existent. I have shot approx. 400 rounds.
Serial: JS0207XX
Model: SIGSCM001
Date:09-SEP-2008
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
recon-1
|
Post subject: Posted: Fri Aug 06, 2010 3:19 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2008 9:29 pm
Posts: 49
Location: PA
|
|
So it seems that the problems are solved?
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
SIGO
|
Post subject: Posted: Sun Aug 08, 2010 11:40 am |
|
Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 8:32 pm
Posts: 2
|
|
Bought my Classic in June 09'.
SIG556301
04/30/09
JSO331XX
No bump, no wear @200rnds.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
BladeZealot
|
Post subject: Posted: Sun Aug 08, 2010 1:21 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2010 6:01 pm
Posts: 5
Location: Mississippi
|
|
2 556's
serial # JT 0004XX
serial # JT 0130XX
no wear or damage at all.
I acquired them both used, and they most certainly will continue to be used.
_________________
Southern born and Southern bred, when I die I'll be Southern dead.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
BB61
|
Post subject: SIGOhio... Posted: Wed Aug 11, 2010 9:36 pm |
|
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2008 1:36 pm
Posts: 8
|
|
bump
Last edited by BB61 on Wed Aug 11, 2010 11:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
BB61
|
Post subject: My bolt carrier after only 60 rounds... Posted: Wed Aug 11, 2010 11:00 pm |
|
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2008 1:36 pm
Posts: 8
|
Serial No. JS027XXX. This is quite disturbing. Over on SIGforum there is a lot of discontent with SIG quality lately. This is only one more nail in the coffin of a once very fine company. I will see how they respond.
http://a.imageshack.us/img535/526/boltcarrier.jpg
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
kevin825
|
Post subject: One more without a problem Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2010 11:46 pm |
|
Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 9:02 pm
Posts: 1
Location: Plano Texas
|
I do not know if I am just lucky or if Sig made some changes but my 556 has over 2000 rounds under its belt and no problems  . I purchased it a year ago july. Ever since reading this thread I have been watching for a sign of wear but to date nothing
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
TommyGunn
|
Post subject: Re: One more without a problem Posted: Mon Aug 16, 2010 9:01 am |
|
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2010 11:28 pm
Posts: 109
Location: Morgan County, Alabama
|
kevin825 wrote: I do not know if I am just lucky or if Sig made some changes but my 556 has over 2000 rounds under its belt and no problems . I purchased it a year ago july. Ever since reading this thread I have been watching for a sign of wear but to date nothing Probably most 556s are good, but a few rifles in every batch have a problem. You no doubt got a good one.
_________________
"It is the American vice, the democratic disease which expresses its tyranny by reducing
everything unique to the level of the herd." ~~ Henry Miller.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
bluefin556
|
Post subject: Posted: Mon Aug 16, 2010 8:46 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 8:50 pm
Posts: 58
Location: Long Island
|
|
Hey Guys, I have less than 500 rounds through my rifle and I have "ejection" marks. That is about it though. My rifle # is JS 032***. Have you guys heard anything bad about this serial number range? I did have to get it looked at by a gunsmith already due to cycling issues. Turns out Sig put the gas regulator on wrong. What do you guys think?
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
BB61
|
Post subject: Posted: Wed Aug 18, 2010 10:19 am |
|
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2008 1:36 pm
Posts: 8
|
|
I spoke with SIG today; they have already sent me a return label. I'll keep everyone posted. So far, I cannot complain about how they have handled my concerns.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
tombirdman
|
Post subject: Posted: Wed Aug 18, 2010 4:25 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 5:01 pm
Posts: 92
Location: Hastings, Nebraska
|
jar9946 wrote: What you guys have to realize, is that you are worrying and complaining over nothing. This is the reason SIG is not taking the problem seriously. It's because they feel it is NOT a problem. As far as causing accuracy issues, I do not believe that is possible either, regardless of what was posted here.
This is a normal wear and tear issue for this particular weapon. I have never seen a weapon system nitpicked like I have the SIG 556 series.
No offense to anyone, but this is my opinion on the matter, and the opinion of most 556 owners, to include SIG themselves. A small minority complaining about a tiny wear mark on the bolt carrier that in no way shape or form effects function will never be taken seriously by SIG.
As far as accuracy....3-4 inches at 100M is AWESOME for a combat rifle. Even 4-5 inches is acceptable. I crack up when I hear people complain about their 3-4 inch 100M groups out of a combat rifle.
You have got to be kidding 1 to 1 1/2 moa should be the max !
These are civilian, military looking, semi autos. They should be capable of this kind of accuracy with the right bullet. Sixty two to 77gr. bullets should be used in a 1/7 twist and 55gr. are quite capable with this twist but not as accurate.
.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
tombirdman
|
Post subject: Posted: Wed Aug 18, 2010 5:11 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 5:01 pm
Posts: 92
Location: Hastings, Nebraska
|
dboyles wrote: I'm not sure if this wear is anything to be concerned about or not. Serial number is JS0250XX. It's a 556 Classic with a date of January 27 2009 on the case.  It shoots 3-4 MOA (10-shot groups) with Prvi 75gr Match ammo from the bench. Not as accurate as I'd like, for sure, but not as bad as some have reported. .
You're using the right ammo!
It should do at least1.5
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
ptco911
|
Post subject: Re: Check your 556 for wear/damage to the carrier Posted: Sun Sep 05, 2010 3:44 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 6:04 pm
Posts: 570
Location: Kansas
|
|
JS029XXX
Hand cycled 300+ and 150 rounds-no sign of abnormal wear.
_________________
I have ten thousand for defense, but none to surrender; if you want our weapons come and get them.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
